Showing posts with label game column. Show all posts
Showing posts with label game column. Show all posts

Monday, October 29, 2012

Oof


Edward Ruscha - "Oof"

I'm stuck in New York. There's apparently a hurricane hovering over my head and Delta airlines thinks it's a bad idea to fly during a hurricane. On Sunday, my girlfriend and I went to the Museum of Modern Art where, inexplicably, you can take pictures of their regular collection. Feeling despondent for most of the day, we came across the Ruscha above. Appropriate.

This post is going to be short because I plan on running through the abandoned streets of Manhattan soon, but Saturday sucked. Al Borges is officially on Greg Mattison "Your Schemes Don't Work" watch and Michigan's receivers appeared to have it in for Russell Bellomy and refuse to catch his passes. Winning the Big Ten may be out of reach. Rooting for MSU and Penn State is now Michigan's only way to make it to Indianapolis, that is of course, if Denard Robinson isn't broken forever. The only good news is that Michigan's defense is for real, which we probably already knew.

Coverage this week will be spotty because of travel complications.

Monday, October 15, 2012

When the dust settles


Terrible Illinois 0 - Michigan 45
Preview
Joseph Tobianski | AnnArbor.com

Now that was vintage Michigan football: injure the opposing quarterback and grind an opponent to dust on defense. Illinois is terrible, but beating them that summarily is still fairly astonishing given the relative talent levels on defense. Even when michigan beat Minnesota last year--a squad in contention for the worst Big Ten team of all time--the Gophers still managed 177 total yards, good for 3.76 yards per play. Against Illinois on Saturday, Michigan's defense held the Illini to 134 yards on 2.5 yards per play. The Wolverine secondary allowed Illinois' two quarterbacks to complete only 7 of 16 passes for 29 yards. The last time Michigan's defense beat a D-I opponent that badly was probably the 2007 Notre Dame game in which they allowed the Irish only 79 yards. Defenders on that team: Terrance Taylor, Brandon Graham, Tim Jamison, Morgan Trent, Donovan Warren, Shawn Crable, Stevie Brown, and Jamar Adams, among others.

There's not much else to say about this game. Michigan beat Illinois at every position, all game. The only thing that slowed Michigan's offense was the non-injury to Denard and two drops by Michigan's receivers on passes thrown by Russell Bellomy. If those catches are made, the Denard injury probably won't even stop Michigan's offense. Fitz Toussaint didn't look great, but that's the only negative that can be taken from this game.

Despite much of the Big Ten schedule left to play including games against Nebraska, Michigan State, and Ohio State, it may be time to start considering Michigan as the best team on both sides of the ball in this conference. Though the Buckeyes just beat up on Nebraska and Indiana, they were still only able to manage 17 points against Michigan State--approximately as much as Iowa did against the Spartans. MSU's defense, meanwhile, has allowed 27 points to Indiana and 20 to a probably bad Notre Dame offense. Though I hate this kind of transitive property assumption, the performances in-conference to date point squarely at Michigan being the most well-rounded team.

With the transformation of the defense this year and last, we can be certain these aren't outlier performances. And with a healthy Denard being on the same page as Al Borges, the sky is the limit for the offense. Make no mistake the 2007 Michigan team would still beat 2012 Michigan to a pulp, but these past two years have been two huge steps to getting this program back to where it's supposed to be. Injured quarterbacks for all!


Bullets
  • So maybe it's time to start panicking about Toussaint. Despite having blockers in front of him all game, he kept trying to break a run to the outside rather than taking the yards he was given and keeping Michigan ahead of the chains. I don't know why he's been so impatient this season--perhaps he's just stir crazy from early in the year--but it's becoming a problem. For the game, he managed just 62 yards on 18 carries.
  • Denard completed 7 of 11 passes for 159 yards and no interceptions. Excise the 71-yard touchdown pass to Gallon and he throws 6/10 for 88 yards (8.8 YPA). Still good. One of the big changes in the last two games has been a relative dearth of deep shots. This is a good thing and the main reason Denard is playing this well. Dear Al, please continue this trend and don't freak out if Michigan gets behind in a game.
  • Three of Michigan's top four tacklers: Jake Ryan (#1), Kenny Demens (#2), and Desmond Morgan (#4). You don't get to a member of the secondary (Kovacs) until eighth on that list, behind James Ross, even. Michigan's front seven is turning into something special.
  • Speaking of which, Demens' interception showed the kind of anticipation and development you want to see from senior linebackers.
  • Dennis Norfleet terrifies me every time he touches the ball.
  • I have a standing rule: if you're a college football team taking field goals longer than 40 yards, you're going to lose that game. This is how Ohio State wins every close game, invariably forcing teams to kick 42-yard field goals (and missing) on 4th and 5. Michigan did this to Illinois in this game. They missed, because obviously they did.
Prediction Tracker
Preview:
Michigan starts scoring early and doesn't look back. Denard doesn't have nearly the rushing totals he did against Purdue, but that's offset by Fitz Toussaint having his best game of the season, finally breaking the 100-yard mark. Denard lights it up through the air though and finishes with two TDs and no interceptions. Defensively, JT Floyd has another strong game but is overshadowed by Jake Ryan who has 3 TFLs. Scheelhaase is pressured early and often and ends up throwing one arm-punt that sets Michigan up for an easy touchdown. Terrible Illinois 13 - Michigan 49
Michigan scored on their first two possessions and were basically only stopped because Denard got injured. Denard's rushing numbers weren't as high as they could have been because Michigan didn't need them to be. The same goes for his passing numbers: no need to throw the ball when everyone on Michigan's roster can find a running lane. Fitz: sadface. Jake Ryan had 3.5 TFLs and 1.5 sacks. Scheelhaase threw one INT but would have thrown more had Jibreel Black not broken his brain.

Next Week
Michigan State. Winning next week would go a long way to locking up the Legends division crown. It would all but knock MSU out of the running, leaving Iowa (2-0), Northwestern (2-1), and Nebraska (1-1) the only teams able to challenge for the title. I called this a 60/40 win for Michigan before the season and haven't seen anything to change that impression: Le'veon Bell is not terrifying despite what people will have you believe, Andrew Maxwell is incredibly raw, and the defense, as mentioned above, has now allowed 27 to Indiana, 20 to Notre Dame, and 19 to Iowa. It will be closer than you'd like, but Michigan should win comfortably.

Monday, October 8, 2012

Running away


Michigan 44 - Purdue 13
Preview
Melanie Maxwell | AnnArbor.com
Usually a win against a typical Purdue team would not inspire a lot of confidence for the future, but given all of the Borges vs. Denard talk the last two weeks, this game represents one of the best marriages of the two talents we've seen to date. During the bye week, Borges said he was going to rewatch every play he had ever called at Michigan and it appeared he followed up on that promise. Gone from Michigan's offense were the downfield heaves, replaced by the short passing game Denard excels at. Denard carried the ball 24 times, his second-highest total this season, most of which were the inverted veer--Michigan's most successful running play all season. Though the level of competition was not up to Notre Dame's defense, this was a return to the style of offense that turned Denard into one of the nation's most dangerous players.

This game was also another building block in the not-so-straw house of Michigan's defense. This Boilermaker offense, while not prolific, is still the most recent team to score an offensive touchdown on Notre Dame and had properly rolled the cupcakes you would expect from a good offense (48 against Eastern Kentucky, 54 against Eastern Michigan, and 51 against Marshall). Putting aside Raymon Taylor's gift pick-six* Michigan held Purdue to just 56 yards on 26 carries (2.2 YPC) and only 157 yards through the air on 23/35. Perhaps the most promising stat of the game is that Michigan's top four tacklers were all front-seven guys (Kenny Demens, Jake Ryan, Desmond Morgan, and Craig Roh). Michigan was controlling the line of scrimmage and hitting Purdue ball carriers at the point of attack. When Jordan Kovacs only makes one tackle in a dominating defensive performance, you know things are looking up.

Then again, Purdue might be terrible, or simply Purdue. Pessimism about this game was born more of Michigan's inadequacies than Purdue's talent, so this win doesn't do a lot more than assure fans that Borges can get this figured out and Greg Mattison and his defensive staff are miracle workers. While I was a lot higher on the defense coming into the year than most people, even I didn't expect performances like this. Despite the loss of Blake Countess, the secondary is humming along, the defensive line started as a question mark but has turned into consistent good-not-great performers, and the linebackers are coming along albeit slower than most would like.

Most importantly, this game gets Michigan back on track. Losses to Notre Dame suck, but they don't have any impact on Michigan's pursuit of the Big Ten title. Holding serve against underdogs and beating Michigan State and Nebraska should more or less assure Michigan a spot in the Big Ten title game against... something from the Leaders division (probably Wisconsin).

*This was Michigan's first pick-six from a member of the secondary since Donovan Warren picked off Ricky Stanzi in 2009 and took it to the house. Michigan also got a pick-six from Brandon Herron against Western Michigan in 2011. This lack of production isn't totally surprising given Michigan's bereft secondary the last few years, but those are dire numbers.


Bullets
  • Fitz Toussaint. Toussaint is not broken, but Michigan's offensive line might be. The only way Michigan could move the ball on the ground is when Denard read a Purdue defender who didn't stay disciplined. Otherwise, the Purdue front seven tore up Michigan's offensive line. That's how Fitz Toussaint goes from a 1,000 yard rusher to getting 19 yards on 17 carries against Purdue. Sure, a few of those were carries form the one yard line that netted exactly as much as was needed, but the interior of Michigan's offensive line is precisely as shaky as it has seemed all year.
  • As a bonus, during the game, the Big Ten Network put up a stat about Denard's rushing this season. Running left, he was averaging 8+ YPC; middle, ~6 YPC; and right ~4 YPC. This is the perfect visualization for the talent on Michigan's offensive line.
  • Update: (directional running at right)
  • There wasn't much receiving to be had in this game as Michigan dominated on the ground, but the names in the boxscore are what you would expect: Gallon, Gardner, Roundtree, and Funchess. Those are your receivers going forward with occasional appearances by Drew Dileo.
  • The Purdue offense is probably terrible, but they couldn't get anything done in this game. More impressively, I think Michigan spent almost the entire game in a base defensive set without much blitzing. They brought in the nickel package a few times, but this game was won by being better at the point of attack.
  • The Denard/Vincent Smith fumble was crappy, but I'm pretty sure it was because of a nickel blitz off the edge. Secondary blitzes on the zone read continue to scare me.
Prediction Tracker
Preview:
Final prediction: It's hard being optimistic about this game given Short and Denard's most recent performance. Michigan's offense is going to stall a lot in this game. But I'm not sure that Purdue's offense will have much success. The over/under for this game is somewhere in the mid- to high-50s, which, if I were a betting man, I'd take the under. This is a low-scoring game with both quarterbacks making a number of mistakes. Short's strength and Michigan's interior line weaknesses actually dictate how this game goes, but Denard breaks a long run that ends up being the difference. Michigan 17 - Purdue 16.
So basically all wrong. Kawann Short ended up being a major factor in the game (8 tackles, 1 TFL, 1 pass breakup), but wasn't able to get to Denard on passing downs. He helped shut down Fitz Toussaint but did little else. Michigan's offense didn't stall at all, punting only twice and missing a long field goal. Also, it's a good thing I'm not a betting man because this game went over the O/U.

Next Week
The next terrible Big Ten team Michigan takes on is terrible Illinois at the Big House. I saw something to this effect Tweeted out this weekend, but in Illinois' last 11 games against BCS competition, Illinois' points for are: 14 (Wisconsin), 7 (Penn State), 14 (Arizona State), 24 (Western Michigan), 20 (UCLA, last year), 7 (Minnesota), 17 (Wisconsin), 14 (Michigan), 7 (Penn State), 14 (Purdue), and 7 (Ohio State). This Nathan Scheelhaase might not be very good. The only thing that gives me pause about this game is Michigan's struggles against Air Force's offense this season, but Illinois does not run the wishbone and their defense appears to be non-existant.

Monday, September 17, 2012

That horse was dead when we got here


UMass 13 - #17 Michigan 63

Games in which the Vegas line is greater than 30 points rarely return any relevant information, especially when the favorite beats the spread. Michigan was supposed to beat UMass by 45 points because they're a bad football team that was shutout by UConn and lost to Indiana by 39. There are now 124 teams in the FBS. UMass ranks 124th in points for and points against, 121st in passing yards, and 120th in rushing yards. There is no "There's something to be said for beating the spread" or "They still had to win the game". UMass is a terrible football team and Michigan beat them adequately.

My brother got married on Friday, so I didn't watch much of this game past the first half, which was just long enough for Denard Robinson to remind me that he is probably still a mediocre passer at best. I'll rewatch the game and analyze a few blitzes that I noticed, but otherwise, there is very little to take away from this game other than raw data.

Monday, September 10, 2012

"It's always good to win"


Air Force 25 - #19 Michigan 31
Preview
Melanie Maxwell | AnnArbor.com

Were you to look only at the box score, Michigan's offense against Air Force appeared more like a 2010 Rich Rodriguez-led team: Denard accounted for all but 7 of the team's total yards (208 through the air and 218 on the ground) and chalked up four touchdowns. But this is not the high-powered option offense that turned Denard into a Heisman contender. In fact, there might be serious problems with this edition of the offense.

Denard didn't dominate this game because he was Michigan's best option, as in previous years. Denard dominated this game because he was the only option. Not knowing the intricacies of offensive line play, it seems that the loss of David Molk has had a far more catastrophic effect on the offensive line than anticipated. Though that can't explain Taylor Lewan or Michael Schofield getting outright beaten off the line of scrimmage, it's clear that something is not right. After being unable to run the ball against Alabama, Michigan fans maintained hope: Bama is a defensive force with a stifling run defense. But after looking incapable of moving the ball against Air Force's porous run defense, it's time to start looking a little more closely at what's going on.

Without rewatching the game, the best I can offer is what everyone else can see. The offensive line just can't get any push upfield, which, against Air Force's undersized defensive front is a major red flag. It could be that the line is still trying to gel, but it seemed like Michigan was running power blocking techniques most of the game, which would negate many of the double teams that could cause confusion on the line. Michigan's offensive linemen were going one-on-one with Air Force and losing the battle.

The good news is Denard Robinson specializes in making something out of nothing. He carried the ball 20 times on Saturday, a number he only surpassed five times last season. Denard is always a weapon, but having to use him this extensively against Air Force rehashes concerns about durability. But you do what's necessary to win the game you're currently playing.

Through the air, Denard was slightly improved, bolstered by the emergence of Devin Beanpole Funchess. In Funchess and Devin Gardner, Michigan might actually have a pair of pass-catchers that can threaten teams downfield and in the red zone. We'll see how Funchess fares when teams actually guard him, but this was an impressive coming out party.

A win is a win, but Saturday's game did more to inspire uncertainty than confidence in the offense--at least the defense had an excuse for its mediocre performance. We saw Schofield struggle mightily against Alabama, but no one expected the offensive line to look so shaky against Air Force. Barring better offensive line play going forward, this season will quickly start veering off course.

Melanie Maxwell | AnnArbor.com
Bullets

  • So yeah, Funchess. A few of his catches were because Air Force just failed to cover him, but he looks like a serious receiving threat at the tight end position. He'll need to add weight, but that'll come with time. For now, he's the most versatile tight end to the roster.
  • Fitz Toussaint struggled today, but that was the fault of the offensive line. There were no running lanes that weren't created from QB draw plays.
  • I don't think the defense fared quite as poorly as the box score indicates. Early in the game, the fullback dive was making more yards than expected (this is either because the defensive line was getting pushed off the ball or making the wrong decision on the option; my guess is the latter), but after the half, most of Air Force's yards were on the outside. That happens against option teams. At the end of the day, the Falcons only averaged 4.1 YPC (albeit on 71 carries), which is well below their average.
  • The Dennis Norfleet hype train will continue, but mark my words: he is going to make a catastrophic error on a kick return this year.
  • I don't really have much insight on this game yet. I need to rewatch it and see exactly what the struggles were on defense and why the offensive line couldn't get any push.

Next Week
Alright, so let's try this again. Michigan takes on UMass next week and should finally be able to really dominate an opponent. The Wolverines have two weeks to prepare for their next real test in Notre Dame. UMass shouldn't present any problems for the offense or defense, so the game needs to be used to iron out run-fit issues and sort out the problems on the offensive line.

Monday, September 3, 2012

You come at the king, you best not miss


#8 Michigan 14 - #2 Alabama 41
Preview

In the second quarter, with Michigan trailing 24-0 and backed up inside their 10-yard line, Kirk Herbstreit was talking about Michigan's non-existant running game. The camera panned up to Al Borges in the coordinator's booth. After relaying the upcoming 3rd down play, Borges shook his head in disbelief and rubbed his face. It was the unmistakeable look of someone who had run out of answers, like working your way through a maze and finding only brick walls.

The problem wasn't Borges' schemes being out flanked. The problem was an offensive line that got pushed into the backfield on every play. It was a quarterback with dysfunctional throwing mechanics unable to hit receivers. It was receivers unable to get separation from their defensive counterparts. Alabama is a great team, but they are not an unbeatable team. There were opportunities to attack them in this game that Michigan simply missed, usually because of performance errors more than schematic inefficiencies.

No one really expected Michigan to win this game; 14-point Vegas spreads are not a mistake. Blogging for the last three seasons, I've been able to explain away most of Michigan's losses: walk-on quarterbacks, untimely turnovers, terrible special teams, unsound schemes. There was always something you could take from the games and say, "If we just did _____ better, we would have won." After watching Alabama dismantle this team, the only feeling I have is frustration: Michigan is just not as good as Alabama. Our team has worse players. The Alabama offensive and defensive lines beat the Michigan offensive and defensive lines. Alabama's linebackers are always in the right spot and safeties fly downhill to blow up option plays in the backfield. AJ McCarron can complete downfield passes.

Blame oversigning and Nick Saban and the SEC for allowing shady recruiting practices. Sure, those are the reasons that Alabama has better players. But regardless of why they're better, Michigan is operating with sub-par talent and will continue to, relative to the national powerhouses, for another few years until their oversigning reserves drain out. So it's frustrating watching your team getting beaten by superior athletes and knowing that it'll be years until you can actually compete with them again.

The game itself played out almost exactly as expected: Alabama pulled away early, Denard struggled to find a rhythm, and the Tide won the game on the ground. Michigan's defensive line held up relatively well. Campbell and Washington took on double teams and didn't get pushed into the secondary, but Michigan's linebackers were outright terrible. Desmond Morgan was pulled after the second (?) Alabama drive in favor of freshman James Ross who also found himself out of position and over-pursuing plays. Kenny Demens is still only able to move in one direction on any given play. And Jake Ryan, who was victimized on a play-action TD pass, was a non-factor as Alabama continuously attacked the middle and weakside of the Michigan defense.

Denard had one of his worst games as a starter but for almost no reason. He was only sacked once and had plenty of time to stand in the pocket and throw, but his mechanics killed his accuracy. Denard stepped into approximately one throw all game, and it ended as a 71-yard touchdown strike to Jeremy Gallon. But on most of his throws, Denard would square his feet and heave the ball downfield. Denard's other major downfall: he was staring down Devin Gardner all game and tried forcing the ball to him rather than taking what the defense offered. While most of his forced throws to Gardner ended in PBUs, one of them ended as a pick-6.

So Michigan lost to a team that's much better than them. Chatter after the game implied that Alabama would have a chance to run the table this year, but there's no way they don't lose at least one or two games. From here, the road only gets easier for Michigan. Playing Air Force and UMass in the next two weeks will be a good primer for the Big Ten season. This team should still challenge for a Big Ten title, but any dreams that they might be one of the nation's elite--given health--have gone out the window.

AP Photo/LM Otero
Bullets
  • Despite it being the opening game of the season, I think it's fair to say that Senior Denard is not a robotic, laser-passing Junior Denard. At this point, Denard is what he is. That'll win Michigan a lot of games this year, but against elite defenses, he's still going to struggle.
  • No, Denard did not get enough carries. His carries wouldn't have gone anywhere either because the Alabama defensive line was in the backfield immediately.
  • Devin Gardner is big and fast but is a horrible route runner. He will mix spectacular plays with missed opportunities because of poor routes.
  • Bubble screens! For whatever reason, Al Borges changed his opinion of bubble screens. Michigan threw two in the game and they were two of the more successful plays the team ran.
  • People are really excited about Dennis Norfleet because... I'm not really sure why. He looks fast, but this game didn't inspire much. He has potential.
  • Elliott Mealer ended up at center for much of the game. I'm not really sure who was playing left guard, but the line seemed coherent. They weren't able to get any push against Alabama's defensive front, but that won't be the case throughout the season.
  • Every time Greg Mattison blitzed, Saban had the perfect play to counter-act it. Aside from the first defensive series, not much of what the defense did made a difference.
  • Michigan forced a three-and-out on the first possession because Alabama ran to the strongside of the field, which Michigan stopped for one yard. After that, they ran almost exclusively at Desmond Morgan and Kenny Demens up the middle and to the weakside.
  • The Countess injury didn't have much of an impact on this game, but it might going forward. Courtney Avery got burned when he slipped on a double move, but otherwise, he was indistinguishable from any other corner.
  • Kovacs and Thomas Gordon both got beaten in the running game by poor angles and arm tackles. So did everyone else though.
  • The whole defensive line, while lacking playmakers, performed well.

Next Week
Michigan looks to get their season back on track next week against Air Force. The Falcons run wishbone option football, which is a little worrysome given the linebacker play and lack of D-line talent. Expect some long runs from Air Force due to poor angles, but the defense should be able to contain a pedestrian attack. Offensively, Denard and Fitz Toussaint should get the team moving.

Monday, November 21, 2011

All your corn are belong to Rich Rodriguez


Melanie Maxwell | AnnArbor.com
When Michigan's shellacking of Nebraska came to an end, I expected Brady Hoke to walk to midfield to shake hands with Bo Pelini whereupon Pelini would pull off his cheap rubber mask to reveal that Rich Rodriguez had actually been in charge of the Cornhuskers' otherwise valiant attempts at bumbling, fumbling football. The mess of kickoff fumbles, blocked punts, and otherwise undisciplined sloppy play reeked of the last three years in the Big House. Except this time, it was the opponent (a non-Notre Dame opponent to boot) that was staring at the sidelines after the football that was supposed to be tucked high and tight in their armpits was bouncing gleefully into the arms of defenders.

I like Rich Rodriguez, more than I rightfully should after the last three years. But JT Floyd and Jeremy Gallon are making him look like an idiot. Since Gallon showed up on campus, he was a bad decision waiting to happen: not fielding punts that he should have in addition to a complete inability to catch. In the short months that Hoke has been on campus, Gallon has become a reliable punt returner and relatively sure-handed. And don't even get me started on Floyd who built on his Illinois performance with another game of jumping routes and blanketing receivers.

An honest question: What were Rodriguez and his staff coaching for three years? The only answer I can muster is "schemes". Rodriguez assumed that at this level, players should have the fundamentals down and focused on schemes. Hoke, on the other hand, mocks your lack-of-toughness schemes and teaches Will Campbell how to keep his ass low to the ground. Whatever it is, Michigan's back-to-back defensive smotherings of decent-to-good offenses prove that this isn't a fluke. The defense is under the best management that it has been since Greg Mattison was last leading the same unit to a national championship over a decade ago.

The offense appears just as well off. Denard ran the ball 23 times in this game, his highest total since Michigan's dismantling of Northwestern over a month ago (and his third highest rushing attempt total of the season). Borges gets it. Denard isn't Chad Henne or Shane Morris, but Borges understands personnel; the previous coaching staff understood schemes. So the offense will probably be a little wonky and grab bag until 2013 when Borges has his prototypical quarterback under center (and he will be very much Under Center). Michigan will run Totally Surprising Jet Sweeps that invariably lose five yards. But when Borges isn't outsmarting himself, he's putting together an effective offensive package that keeps defenses on their toes and finds ways to utilize all of Michigan's vast skill players.

At this point, it's fair to say that Rodriguez's recruiting hauls were probably not as deficient as previously thought. A lot of the non-contributors over the last three years, especially on defense, are panning out as effective starters and in some cases, possible All Big Ten performers. But that's not such a great thing for Rodriguez's reputation. The better this team gets--and they will continue to get better--the more you have to ask, What the hell was going on the last three years?

Bullets
  • How nice is it that all of the special teams blunders are not being committed by your team? When's the last time Michigan blocked a punt? How enjoyable is it to be relatively certain Gallon is going to catch any punt sent his way but also make a few yards without fumbling?
  • Fitz Toussaint looks more and more like an NFL running back the more carries he gets. His lateral movement is incredible. There are only a few running backs in the country with a more effective cut than his. So long as he doesn't fall in love with it and maintains it as a tool to run vertically, Toussaint is going to be the best Michigan running back in a long time.
  • Denard, however, had another rough day running. For whatever reason, he's really struggled making decisions in the running game. In the last few games, Denard has shown a tendency to bounce everything to the outside, even when he has a lane up the middle. He may be trying to avoid some hits, but I'd guess he's trying to bust every run long rather than taking the running lanes given to him. The coaches will surely talk to him about this. His new-found ability to scramble is a wonderful addition to the offense, however.
  • Jibreel Black is done seeing relevant snaps this year. He refuses to play contain on the quarterback on option plays and was responsible for a significant chunk of Taylor Martinez's rushing yards.
  • Michigan ran 80 offensive plays in this game. Nebraska ran 54. Time of possession is a worthless stat, but those numbers are unreal. Michigan's defense booted the Cornhuskers off the field with ease (Nebraska was only 3-13 on third down and I believe they were 0-7 at one point) and the offense maintained long scoring drives.
  • Denard's interception was a clone of one that he threw earlier. He struggles mightily throwing those RB screens. Otherwise, he seemed to have a really good day through the air. That touchdown to Odoms was his best throw of the season.
Next week
Ohio.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Iowa 2011: Where first downs are a killer


#15 Michigan 16 - Iowa 24
Melanie Maxwell | AnnArbor.com
In the first three quarters against Iowa, Michigan had 20 first downs. They ran the ball on 14 of them and gained only 50 yards for 3.57 YPC, mostly because Iowa broke tendency and played a single-high safety defensive front, stacked against the run. With someone like Chad Henne under center--a polished passer--an average of 2nd and 7 isn't as large of an issue, but Denard Robinson has shown time and again that he can't excel in long down and distance situations.
On the season, he completed 62.5% of his passes for 8.8 yards per attempt. On obvious passing downs, he completed only 44% of his passes for 5.7 yards per attempt. In addition, Denard threw nearly half of his interceptions in these scenarios. While you might expect that (trying to force the ball to a receiver to pick up a first down), it implies that he's either not particularly careful with the ball in OPD (he had a 7.1% interception ratio) or he has difficulty reading defenses and executing the throws.
Regardless, when Michigan earned a first down against Iowa in non-hurry-up mode, 75% of the time, the team would line up in a running formation, with Iowa's defense loading the box, and head directly into it.

When the team was down 15 points in the fourth quarter, Al Borges decided to spread the field and air it out. On their fourth-quarter scoring drive, Denard threw the ball on all four first downs. He connected for gains of 7, 9, 13, and 7, all four complete and one of them for a touchdown. On that drive, Michigan marched 57 yards in just under three minutes, had one incompletion, and didn't have a single negative play.

Michigan is a better football team than Iowa, of this I cannot be convinced otherwise. This is a loss that can be chalked up to a coaching transition. The I formation, both the coaching staff's insistence on using it and the team's inability to consistently exceed from it, explicitly lost Michigan this game.  It's a growing pain, though the last time this happened, we were losing to Toledo, so things could be worse.

With the talent and performance of this Michigan unit to date, a loss like this shouldn't be too frustrating: they aren't good enough to challenge for a BCS bowl and in a non-Bizarro Big Ten, they wouldn't be anywhere near a Big Ten championship. But with everyone in the league intent on losing to vastly inferior teams, Michigan was solidly in the running for a birth in the Big Ten title game. This loss effectively takes them out of it.

What this says about the coaching staff is disappointing in the short term but not wholly unexpected. Brady Hoke's "We will run power" is not a lie, as early returns indicated. Losses like this don't need to happen but they do when you're switching coaches. Hoke is building a program in his image and unfortunately, that image doesn't best utilize the skills of Michigan's current personnel. Rodriguez did the same thing when he arrived on campus and Michigan went 3-9. With a team that's still wildly outplaying expectations and a coaching staff that has proven to be a significant upgrade over the previous one, this loss is the equivalent of being told you have to eat three more bites of vegetables before desert: you really don't want to but the reward will be something sweet.

Bullets
  • Desmond Morgan is a freshman. Morgan was atrocious in this game (I expect MGoBlog's UFR to be ugly for him). The first two scoring drives were nearly single-handedly his fault. He lost contain on almost all runs and Iowa made it a point to attack Michigan's WLB all game. It was no surprise that the coach's pulled Mogan after Iowa's second drive, but I was surprised to see him back on the field in the second half. This is still a young team.
  • Blake Countess is a freshman. And he's really good. Countess is the best cornerback Michigan has had since well before Rodriguez came to Ann Arbor. He's going to be a special player.
  • Denard had another awful day. Most of Denard's issues, as mentioned above, came from throwing in a long down and distances. The other factor contributing to his struggles were the wide receivers once again completely unable to create separation. Opponents have seen the tape and taken note: if you're physical with Michigan's receivers, you'll stick to them like glue. Denard was, however, progressing through his reads better than he has all season, which is encouraging.
  • The running backs struggled because Iowa, like Michigan State, loaded the box and dared Michigan to throw the ball. The lack of audibles at the line is increasingly frustrating.
  • The goal line stand. Iowa called four straight house blitzes when Michigan had first down from the three yard line. My only real complaint with the playcalling was the timeout before that series. When Michigan had the ball 1st and goal with the clock stopped, they should've run the ball, giving Denard one chance to get into the endzone by himself, and then called the timeout. Instead, they allowed Iowa to set their defense and bring in the right personnel. They blitzed the house all four downs so that Michigan had to throw the ball. My other gripe was not calling a screen pass on fourth down. When it became clear that Iowa was bringing everyone, sneaking Vincent Smith out to the flat on the screen seems like the best course of action. Instead, Roundtree got pressed at the line of scrimmage and couldn't create separation.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Michigan State 2011: Where Little Brother finds your weakness


#11 Michigan 14 - #23 Michigan State 28
Jeff Sainlar | AnnArbor.com
The last time my older brother and I got in a serious altercation was on Thanksgiving Eve a few years ago. It was past midnight at our parents' house and we were both in town for the holiday. Neither of us felt like going out, so we opened a few beers and my poker set, and sat down at the dinner table to play a few games heads up until we got too bored, angry, or tired to keep going.

My brother is a better poker play than me. Aside from knowing the odds, he's also more disciplined; it's difficult to bluff if you haven't won any hands yet, but invariably, that becomes my strategy early in poker games. But I know my brother's greatest weakness and more importantly, I know how to exploit it: get in his head. If only I could win a few toss-up hands, I knew I could give him enough mental jabs to get him totally off his rocker. After about an hour of playing, he stormed off into his room as I sat at the table shrugging saying something to the effect of, "Whatever dude, just sit down and shut up and we'll play." This was a victory.

It's not just poker either. My brother is taller, stronger, and smarter than I am, and being of a religiously competitive breed, we spent most of our childhood figuring out Who Is Better, which meant I needed to figure out what his weaknesses are and how to exploit them. In basketball, I have a speed advantage that I use to get to the basket. Defensively, I know that when I don't contest his shot, he tends to shoot with less arc, causing more rim outs. These are petty, small, unsustainable strategies that have become my only defense against someone who is objectively better than me at a few key competitive events.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When Mike Hart now famously referred to Michigan State as Little Brother in 2008, the Spartans took it as the greatest sign of disrespect, but in reality, it's not that far off. When people think "football" and "Michigan", the first thing that comes to mind is the Wolverines; teachers called me by my brother's name an innumerable amount of times through gradeschool and high school. But less disrespectfully, Michigan State is a growing program, fighting for national relevance by slowly making itself a force to be reckoned with. Michigan, meanwhile, was the established entity.

Michigan's weaknesses are not the same as my brother's--he understands statistics, so he knows better than to punt from the opponent's 36 yard line on fourth and four. Michigan State plays like a little brother, though. For the last several years, more than any other opponent, they've identified and exploited Michigan's weaknesses en route to commanding victories.  Michigan's linebackers and defensive ends struggle with contain? They run almost exclusively outside of the tackles (even with two mediocre-to-bad offensive tackles). Denard Robinson struggles throwing under pressure? Bring heat constantly. Michigan runs well but struggles throwing the deep ball, even with man coverage and no safety help? Load the box.

You would think that Al Borges and Greg Mattison would change tendencies. How many times does an opponent have to blitz before Borges calls that throwback screen to Smith? How many times can Michigan State run outside the tackles before you bring a safety/cornerback blitz off the edge? In this game, unfortunately, either arrogance, ignorance, or just befuddlement caused Michigan's coordinators to spend most of the afternoon slamming their head against a brick wall and hoping that eventually, it would crumble. It didn't, of course, because the brick wall was made of brick and your head is made of squishy tissue that, if this were Rock-Head-Brick Wall, would lose to brick wall. (Head would also lose to rock for what it's worth. It doesn't seem like a very balanced game.)

So Michigan goes into its bye week 6-1. This was never supposed to be a BCS season, and 10-2 with a win over Ohio State would still be a better case scenario than most expected preseason. Michigan has its flaws and at this point, they're obvious to everyone, including the Michigan coaching staff. Finding ways to remedy those, or at the very least mask them, has become Borges' and Mattison's primary mission.

Bullets
  • Borges comes in for some lashings after this game. The offense continued to run plays that were doomed from the start. All passing routes were vertical and downfield. Rushes were stuffed at the line as Michigan State loaded the box. There were no screens thrown against an aggressive blitzing defense. Borges was punked the whole game and seemed content to run the same plays through four quarters.
  • Mattison, on the other hand, called a pretty good game. Were it not for the defensive ends and linebackers giving up the edge on rushes, the defense shut down the MSU offense. Kirk Cousins averaged only 5 yards per attempt. The Spartan offensive line was as advertised: soft. But by doubling Michigan's defensive ends with tight ends, Michigan State was able to get the edge and run all over Michigan's undisciplined defense.
  • It was a good day for Mark Huyge's new charity Spartans in the Backfield (SitB). Huyge had a truly awful day and offered MSU's defenders a direct line to Denard on countless passing plays.
  • Denard struggled, but there were reasons for it outside of his control. SitB was a huge problem all game. In addition, the Michigan State defense loaded the box making running nearly impossible.
  • Despite playing against single coverage, Michigan's receivers were completely shut down. I'll have to watch again, but they seemed to get precisely zero separation against MSU's corners. Though Denard wasn't very accurate, he didn't have many open receivers to throw to.
  • Michigan showed another counter to the heavy-I formation they debuted last week but it was blown dead on a delay of game penalty, which is a shame because Fitz Toussaint had a 20+-yard carry.
Next week
Michigan is on its bye this week. They can use this time to get healthy and implement more of the offensive and defensive schemes. The following week, Michigan takes on Purdue, a game that will be a good barometer for the rest of the season.

Around here, this week will feature the regular post-game analysis. The following week will be a mid-season breakdown of where I expected to be at this point and where they are now.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Northwestern 2011: Where the defense got stingy


#12 Michigan 42 - Northwestern 24
In five of Michigan's nine losses during the 2008 season, the Wolverines were either ahead or tied at the half. But during the subsequent two quarters, Michigan's offense crumbled and the defense wasn't good enough to prop the team up. Throughout the Rodriguez years, exponential in-game decline became a staple of the team's performance. When the second half rolled around, teams would adjust to Michigan's schemes. Rodriguez and company seemed unconcerned and for the most part ran the same plays they had shown in the first half. Some of that was necessity: Michigan had a young, inexperienced team and the coaches were slowly implementing their offense. That's the excuse Rodriguez defenders would use, anyway. Critics only saw brazen disregard for the opposition's schematic adjustments and a lack of concern for a crumbling on-field product.

The first half against Northwestern is one that Michigan will want to forget. Denard threw three interceptions and the defense was being dissected by the Dan Persa-led Wildcats. In the last three years, when Michigan was dominated as thoroughly as they had been in the first half Saturday, it was usually en route to an Ohio State or Wisconsin pummeling. On Saturday, something was different, and it wasn't just Denard identifying who was and wasn't on his team and throwing it to the right players.

True that Northwestern is known for these types of defensive collapses/shootouts. Just the week before, they lost a double digit lead to Illinois. But holding Northwestern's offense to 161 second-half yards--79 of which came in garbage time--and no points is impressive regardless of who's playing. When it's the Defense Formerly Known as Smoldering Crater, it's a minor miracle. Though through six games, Greg Mattison could favorably be described as just that: a miracle worker. Mattison, Hoke, and the defensive staff have turned JT Floyd into a legitimate Big Ten corner, Jordan Kovacs into an All Big Ten performer, and changed Will Campbell from a giant body that gets pushed around to a giant body that stands still.

When Hoke was first hired, a few coaches around the country said it's not a matter of if Hoke wins a national championship but when. After the strides made by the team since Hoke's arrival, those claims start inching toward reality. Lots of things have to go right to win a national championship, but if this coaching staff can turn this collection of Wolverines into a Big Ten title contender (albeit in arguably the worst Big Ten in 10--20?--years), the chances of them turning their own prospects and players into a national championship team are in reach. The flexibility and ingenuity of the coaching staff mean only good things for the future.

That's a long way off, and any talk of national championships is premature. What this performance means currently is that Michigan has a very real chance of beating everyone on their schedule this year. Honestly, at this point, would you bet against Mattison, Borges, and Hoke?

Comments
  • I think it's fair to say that Denard's struggles in the passing game this year weren't a function of the abscess he had removed from his elbow prior to the Minnesota game. For any struggling quarterback's ills, it's clear that Minnesota is the panacea. Denard's interceptions against Northwestern are some of the worst that he's ever thrown. They were no where near his receivers and in at least one case, probably took away a touchdown. He even threw an interception on the brilliant counter draw play action (which, yes, will be picture paged).
  • Non-Denard rushers had a rough game. Despite Northwestern's putrid run defense performance against Army, it looks like their run defense might be for real. Seeing as they had more success against Michigan's running game than any other team this season (or last, possibly), I don't expect Michigan's running game to be significantly slowed going forward.
  • I'm really not a fan of Devin Gardner taking snaps when Denard is healthy. I'm even more worried about the jet sweeps that Denard was running. This seems like a surefire way to get him drilled by linebackers. Michigan has much better ways of picking up six yards than running Denard in a wonky trick play.
  • Persa completed a lot of passes (32/44) for a lot of yards (331), but I don't think the secondary had an especially poor day. Courtney Avery continues to struggle and Blake Countess got beaten once, but otherwise, the secondary was par for the course.
  • The front seven looked solid, often getting to Persa and and clogging the middle of the field. Northwestern's leading rusher had 31 yards on five carries. Most of NW's rushing yards came on triple option plays that the linebackers lost contain on. Fortunately, Kovacs and his  Mighty Mites in the secondary wrapped up everyone before they could do too much damage.
  • The I-formation returned and if I can recall, it wasn't totally awful. That's a change but not totally unexpected. Michigan is still far more effective from the shotgun, but using it as a change of pace (and not in Totally Surprising Third and One Carry) might be beneficial.
Next week
Michigan travels to East Lansing to face MSU on Saturday. The Spartans are coming off of a bye week, giving them extra time to prepare for the only game that matters. This'll be an interesting matchup. The Spartans offensive line is basically non-existent, turning Kirk Cousins from potential All Big Ten QB to just a guy, and it makes their lethal RB tandem a lot less, ya know, lethal. They've also had two weeks to prepare. We'll see what Hoke et al have in their bag of tricks for this game.

Monday, September 19, 2011

Eastern Michigan 2011: Where Threetidan looms


I can still remember the final pass of Michigan's season opening 2008 defeat to Utah in vivid detail. Despite a putrid all-around performance from the offense, Michigan still had a chance. Down by only two points with a little over two minutes to go, Michigan received the ball with the opportunity to drive for a final touchdown or field goal and seal an unlikely, and mostly undeserved, victory. On fourth and seven, Steven Threet hurled a ball 10 feet over the head of Darryl Stonum and out of bounds. The game was effectively over, but more importantly, I remember the distinct sense of doom that fell over me and everyone else watching the game once the offense limped to the sideline.

On Saturday, Michigan won, and if you only look at the box score, won in convincing fashion, hammering Eastern Michigan to the tune of 31-3. But for anyone who watched the game, things were not so peachy. Michigan gained a total of 32 (!) yards in the first quarter, went three and out three times during the game, and showed an offense that looked as dysfunctional as it did unsustainable. It wasn't until the second half when Al Borges decided to let Denard Robinson loose on QB draws that the offense began to resemble a functional unit.

After a 7/18, 95 yard (5.3 YPA) day against a MAC bottom dweller, it's difficult to see Denard Robinson as a sustainable option at quarterback in Borges' offense. It may sound reactionary, but after another game riddled with poor decisions (chucking the ball into double coverage) and spotty accuracy, and against competition that shouldn't be able to compete with Michigan's athletes, it's clear that Denard's struggles in the passing game last year, his uninspiring spring game, and his poor passing performances against Notre Dame and Western Michigan are no flukes. He locks onto receivers, struggles with his accuracy, and frequently makes near backbreaking decisions.

There is a silver lining though. Had Rich Rodriguez brought back Mike DeBord to coach the 2008 offense, it still would have been terrible. With this team, there are options. When Borges did unleash Denard, he ran wild, as he (and everyone else on the team) should have against a hodgepodge of JUCOs and lower-level MAC players. If Borges is smart, and I think that he is, this game will be a clear indication that in order to move the ball, Denard's legs will have to bear the brunt of the load. Not only could Denard run against Eastern, but his legs once again opened up the QB draw play action that was used to devastating effect last year.

It's not that Denard can't be a great college quarterback. Last year proved that he can. It's that he can't be a great quarterback in a pass-first, I-formation offense. If Borges and Hoke know what's good for them, they'll start tailoring the offense around Denard's legs now to avoid a catastrophic meltdown as the season progresses.

Bullets
  • Though I wanted to see the I-formation in this game, after watching Michigan's linemen struggle with blocking and running backs fail to hit the proper holes, consider this my vote to have the I-formation banned from the playbook for the rest of the year. There are just far too many fundamental problems with how the team runs it currently, that it's not something they should be utilizing in games yet.
  • Eastern Michigan averaged 4.5 yards per carry on 46 carries which is really bad, but I wouldn't read too much into it. Greg Mattison seemed to play the game in the most vanilla fashion imaginable. There was very little blitzing and the team spent most of the game in a Ron English-like defense. This does, however, go further to explaining why Michigan struggles so mightily to open games without blitzing: they're terrible in zone coverage and struggle stuffing the line of scrimmage without added pressure from the linebackers and safeties.
  • I assumed the offense would fruitlessly burn the redshirt of one of their freshman running backs and lo and behold, Thomas Rawls got two carries and looked like a true freshman. This is an utter waste with three to four established running backs higher on the depth chart.
  • Devin Gardner desperately needed more than one garbage time possession. With Denard's early-season struggles, there's a good chance he'll be needed (regardless of injury to Denard) later this year. I remain unimpressed by his performances to date and would've liked to see him get more time to develop in the system.
  • Craig Roh had a decent game and seemed to outperform Jibreel Black, who is currently fighting for the starting role. Roh had one sack and seemed marginally more effective than Black who was often chasing, and being outrun by, EMU running backs.
  • Other insights gleaned from the rest of the game are hit or miss. EMU rarely threw the ball, so the secondary wasn't tested. The defensive line saw a lot of rotation, though we already knew the backups were a noticeable step back. And none of the running backs really impressed.
Next week, Michigan takes on Hoke's old stomping ground San Diego State. Chances are this is when Michigan will start using Denard in running situations more consistently and tailoring the offense around him. If not, this is going to be a long year.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Notre Dame: Where 11/24 is good enough


My roommate often tells me that my analysis and understanding of sports is too statistically dependent. It's the old "that's why they play the game" argument. Human error (or human triumph, as is the case for one dreadlocked Florida-born quarterback) plays a far more significant role in determining the outcome of a game than do the statistics that say, for example, that Notre Dame should have won on Saturday in Ann Arbor or that possibly, that they were a more talented team before the game began. But for me, statistics help me rationalize things. They both confirm what I see on the field and help me reconcile how my beliefs differ from those of others.

So when trying to figure out what to write about after one of the most thrilling, unlikely football games I've ever witnessed, my mind kept coming back to this graph from Advanced NFL Stats:

That graph is intended as a baseline estimator for a team's real-time win probability and is independent of situation, but the site also offers a crude win probability calculator, which, while it's calibrated to an NFL scale, can at least give us a decent estimate of how unlikely Michigan's victory was: four percent, Michigan's win probability after Notre Dame's slot receiver scampered into the endzone without a defender in site. Denard Robinson laughs at your probabilities and says, "Really? Oh man, that's crazy," and throws the ball to Jeremy Gallon standing alone in the Notre Dame secondary.

Michigan's win on Saturday is a testament to the team's resilience and dumb luck. Luck that Tommy Rees got butter fingers in the red zone. Luck that half of Denard's 50/50 jump balls ended up in the hands of Michigan receivers. Luck that the Notre Dame secondary is as prone to crippling mental mistakes as Michigan's. But it's also the kind of game you secretly expect Brady Hoke's team to win because they just want it more, or maybe only he does, but it's something that resonates with the team.

Four percent is bad odds but it's also not a death sentence. Two years ago, Rich Rodriguez and Tate Forcier knew it. Last year, Denard Robinson knew it. And this year Roy Roundtree knew it and asked Denard to give him a chance on the final play. Brady Hoke might not know what Michigan's win probability is at any time during the season, but he also doesn't care because, and this might sound arrogant, this is Michigan.

Bullets
  • Welcome back to earth Denard. I've been skeptical that Denard can excel in a system that doesn't feature his legs like RichRod's did, and this game, in addition to his lackluster day against Western Michigan, is further evidence of that. Despite being praised for leading Michigan's winning touchdown drive, Denard was certifiably awful in this game, completing only 11 of 24 passes and throwing three bad interceptions. In spite of all of that, Denard's pass efficiency rating for the game (194.1) was astronomical because when he wasn't throwing the ball to Notre Dame defenders, he was tossing up jump balls to any receiver that had single coverage. His stat line was eerily similar to those of Georgia Tech quarterbacks of the last few years: option quarterbacks that can't complete many passes but when they do, they always go for a big gain. Denard is going to struggle mightily throughout this season, as expected. Let's just hope he has enough magic in him to get the team bowl eligible.
  • Brian Kelly had Greg Mattison's number. It's clear Notre Dame watched a lot of film from the Western Michigan game. The Irish offense was able to counter Michigan's zone blitzes with running back draws up the middle of the field as Mike Martin ran away from the play, and identify single coverage all over the field. Were Tommy Rees not Favring the game away with irresponsible turnovers, this game ends much more unpleasantly and with Mattison taking a lot more heat.
  • That said, this marks the second straight game that Michigan has won the turnover battle. Michigan's aggressive defense is causing turnovers and should continue to do so all season. It's clear this is going to be a high-risk, high-reward defense. Fortunately, Michigan doesn't face any athletes like Michael Floyd, who can so easily exploit those risks, for the rest of the year.
  • Michigan corners continued the disturbing trend of only face guarding in man coverage. Courtney Avery was called for an iffy pass interference call in the endzone late in the game, but referees make a lot of bad pass interference calls because corners are face guarding. If the coaching staff can't correct this before Big Ten play, expect teams to aggressively attack corners in man coverage.
  • Michigan's running game was terrible. Non-Denard rushers carried the ball eight times for a total of 10 yards. The offensive line was not built for this kind of offense. Moar zone blocking.
  • Denard, however, was set loose on a zone read play that we haven't seen from this or the prior coaching staff. I'll likely picture page it later in the week, but the offensive line would create a hole in the B gap and entice the playside linebacker (usually Manti Te'o) to plug that hole. When Te'o did, which he did frequently, Denard would pull the ball and run outside of the tackles. This is going to be Michigan's best running play this year. It'll also be interesting to see if Al Borges designs some counters to this play that will exploit teams trying to stop it.
  • Michigan's run defense was porous for the second straight game. Cierre Wood averaged 5.4 YPC on 24 carries. While large chunks of those yards came on long runs as the result of zone blitzes, that's one of the risks Michigan will take this year. Mattison needs to be less predictable in the future.
Going forward, I'm still leery of this offense. It had trouble finding a rhythm (Michigan's longest drive was only five plays) and doesn't really have anything that it does particularly well. Denard will need to take major steps to lead this offense to something resembling competitive. Conversely, the defense, though it has a few issues, once again showed promise.

Next week, Michigan takes on Eastern Michigan and should be able to experiment with new plays and work on perfecting the base offense. If nothing else, it'll be a virtual bye week for Michigan to get healthy.

Monday, September 5, 2011

WMU 2011: Where the jury is still out


The first quarter of Michigan's win over Western Michigan on Saturday was basically worst case scenario. Michigan won the coin toss and deferred to the second half. Western Michigan took the ball and promptly marched down the field with the greatest of ease. Alex Carder went something like 7/7 on the drive. Michigan played strictly a passive zone defense, rushing three or four linemen and dropping everyone else into coverage. The drive lasted 7:11 and took 15 plays, and never once did the Wolverines look like they were going to stop the Broncos.

Down 7-0, Michigan received the ball and proceeded to slog down the field during an 8:33, 16-play drive that never felt comfortable. The Wolverines found themselves in a 3rd and 3, 3rd and 5, 3rd and 4, and a 4th and 1 (from the WMU 19-yard line where Hoke deferred to the offense rather than sending out the kicking team). Michigan was tied 7-7 with Western Michigan a minute into the second quarter, and they had done so in the most concerning fashion imaginable.

Then the skies opened, both literally and figuratively. It was as if Greg Mattison wanted to show everyone what happened last year and how things would be different this season. Suddenly Jordan Kovacs was blitzing off the edge and Kenny Demens was screaming through the middle of the offensive line and all the corners were left alone on Revis Avery Island to defend for themselves. The following WMU drives ended thusly: missed field goal, interception, punt, made field goal, fumble (caused by pressure), punt, fumble. This is the defense we expected to see.

Despite this obvious progress, I couldn't help but be a little dismayed at the relative closeness of the game. Brandon Herron brought back a tipped pass and a fumble for a touchdown, one of which explicitly took points off the board for WMU. Brandon Gibbons had an extra point blocked. The offense had two three-and-outs. And the offense's final touchdown was more a function of WMU's defense being embarrassingly out of position on back-to-back plays, than it was the tinkering schemes of a madman (e.g. last year's play action QB draws). Taking into account that this was only the first game under this regime (and boy was that obvious from the defense on the first drive of the game), if you remove the plays that aren't easily replicable against other teams (the defensive scores), Michigan is suddenly in a 20-10 game against WMU with a kicker who gets extra points blocked and an offense that went 3 and out on two of its five drives.

These are not encouraging numbers against a MAC program, especially because the team's only game experience before next week's showdown against once again overrated (by me as well) Notre Dame was shortened by lightning and water plummeting from the heavens. But the defense caused turnovers as a result of timely defensive playcalling and the offense did what it was supposed to do. I have concerns but Saturday was a good start.

Bullets
  • We gave Matt Wile a scholarship to kick footballs right? Can we please let him kick footballs? He held his own punting (averaging 41 yards per kick on two attempts) and looked comptent on kickoffs. Now if only the team could cover kickoffs and punts, the special teams might not be a black hole this year.
  • Denard was 9/13 through the air for 98 yards (7.5 YPA) with at least one late throw that Roundtree was able to rope in. He looked comfortable throwing in the pocket but still has major mechanical issues that will become a problem later in the year.
  • Denard's rushing numbers were not so encouraging: 8 carries for 46 yards (5.8 YPC). On the first play of the game, Michigan ran a QB stretch around the outside that picked up 12 yards, but for the rest of the game, Denard was being run between the tackles. While he's able to do so, getting him on the edge and putting a serious strain on the defense is a better gameplan. Hopefully the coaching staff was keeping a lot of their tricks in the bag, because if they weren't, Denard is going to have a difficult time on the ground this year. It cannot be underestimated what Rodriguez's tweaks did for Denard's ability to find open field.
  • Blitzes! Last year, I complained about the lack of blitzing and man coverage from the defense, which drew much skepticism from readers. Mattison showed exactly why you need to bring pressure: if the quarterback can't get off a good throw, it doesn't matter who is in coverage.
  • Courtney Avery started opposite Troy Woolfolk at corner as expected, and was OK. All of the corners were face guarding on deep throws rather than getting their heads around to defend the ball. If this trend continues, it'll be a long season with lots of pass interference calls. Woolfolk, on the other hand, looked like a man possessed until he got injured (of course).
  • There was a ton of defensive rotation up front and it was clear how much of a falloff there is between the starters and backups. As MGoBlog mentioned, hopefully this rotation was more a function of the overwhelming heat than a defensive gameplan.
  • Jeremy Gallon caught a punt! Kelvin Grady was terrible on kickoff returns.
Next week Michigan takes on Notre Dame under the lights. They've got a lot of work to do before then, but this was a good start. Sorting out some of the early-game issues on defense and expanding the offensive playbook a bit more will help. Besides, if the Irish are as bad on Saturday as they were against USF, it's possible none of that will matter.

Monday, November 29, 2010

Ohio State: Where whatever


Michigan's season is not so mercifully over. There were highs and lows and eventually, Michigan ended up about as good as everyone thought they would: 7-5 with a terrible defense and a great offense. No one expected the offense to be quite this prolific or the defense to be quite this bad, but Michigan fared about exactly as they should have.

Saturday's game, though pretty demoralizing, shouldn't change anyone's opinion on Rich Rodriguez. Three of Michigan's five losses came against one-loss, BCS top-10 teams. One came on the road against a resurgent Penn State team and the other against a middle-of-the-road Iowa team.

Asking that Michigan be more competitive against Ohio State sort of misses the point. Were it not for a 170-pound Ray Vinpoal being a 170-pound true freshman that gets trucked by 200-pound junior running backs despite being in perfect position, Ohio State averaged 3.8 YPC. Terrelle Pryor looked, well, like Pryor, and not some manfreak that the defense turned him into. Michigan's four-man defensive line was functional. The offense only stopped when it killed itself (which was frequent). It was a lack of execution and inexperience that made this game uncompetitive, not schemes, raw talent, or fluke plays. Ohio State is basically perfection in terms of doing what they're trained to do. Michigan isn't yet. Whether that's a function of starting mostly underclassmen or poor coaching is a debate, but I'd be willing to bet it's 85% inexperience and 15% coaching.

I have very little else to say on this topic right now and am in the middle of a conference for work, so content on the game will be scarce until Thursday or Friday.

Bullets
  • I feel at least somewhat confident saying this: Greg Robinson will be your defensive coordinator next year. It won't make you want to die. I think there's been enough improvement on the defensive side of the ball in the last few weeks that Robinson, working at the talent disadvantage he is, may be given another shot.
  • Roy Roundtree will be wearing #12 next year.
  • Vincent Smith will be your starter in the bowl game and 2011.
  • The defense looked good in this game until it was clear that all of the momentum was going Ohio State's way. Michigan failed to score in the red zone twice early, and that's when it all started going downhill. You just can't give a team like Ohio State more chances than they already have.
  • Denard finally scrambled and it was awesome. Except when he fumbled and it wasn't.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Wisconsin: Where it went about as expected


Were it not for a ridiculous implosion against Michigan State, Wisconsin would be sitting alongside undefeateds Auburn and Oregon, hoping that they'll be in Arizona for the national championship game. Wisconsin is that good. It's not surprising, then, that Michigan struggled so mightily against an oversized, veteran unit that is unquestionably the best outfit in the Big Ten. That doesn't make Michigan's complete inability to stop the run or their general defensive incompetence any less disappointing, but it does mitigate it somewhat.

By the second half, Wisconsin had completely abandoned the passing game, but it didn't matter. The Badgers stable of backs averaged 6.2 YPC on an astounding 58 carries. Scott Tolzien, meanwhile, went 14/15 for 201 yards--his only incompletion was an interception to James Rogers which sort of stopped the bleeding at the end of the first half. But again, none of this surprised anyone. Tolzien is a senior quarterback with all the talent to torch Michigan's secondary. And most of their starters are 4th- and 5th-year seniors. If you could describe the perfect storm for Michigan, it was Wisconsin.

The more bothersome aspect of the game was Michigan's offense getting shut out in the first half. Denard overthrew a clear touchdown pass and Broekhuizen missed yet another field goal. So there were points to be had. But in general, Michigan's offense was thoroughly stymied in the first half. I'll have to rewatch the game to see if Michigan made any changes in the second half or just executed better, but the offense finally got going behind the legs and arm of Denard.

Bullets
  • Speaking of Denard, this is the best he's looked since before Michigan State. He finally got the ground game going and his passing looked much improved. The interception was decidedly not his fault. JJ Watt had basically a free release to bat the ball into the air. Not to mention that the play before Roy Roundtree had an egregious first down drop. (This is the second time that the play directly following a Roundtree first down drop that Denard has thrown an interception.)
  • Receivers: Darryl Stonum had, by far, his best game this year and possibly his best in a the Winged Helmet. That over-his-head catch that he made at the four yard line was utterly ridiculous, and he was getting separation on cornerbacks all day. Roundtree, on the other hand, is proving a bothersome trend of dropping sure catches. I don't know why this has started to happen, but every week, it seems like we can count on at least one Roundtree drop.
  • Injuries to Roh and Martin are bad news for Michigan's defense. Losing one or both for the Ohio State game spells certain doom.
  • Vincent Smith looked like he had another good game, but the box score begs to differ (50 yards on 11 carries). Stephen Hopkins, meanwhile, should probably start losing some of his carries. This is the second straight week that he's looked overmatched and unable to make proper cuts.
  • Missed tackles, argh.
  • Jeremy Gallon, argh. Yet another game that Gallon looked terrible on kick returns, punctuated by the injury/fumble. It was amazing to see the different between Gallon and when Stonum/Drew Dileo started returning. The latter two were both able to make good cuts and get upfield in a hurry. I have no idea why Gallon is allowed on the field.
  • Michigan's handling of the end of the first half didn't really bother me. Given how the offense was moving the ball in the first half, not taking shots downfield was fine. Especially when it was clear that, if given any time at all, Wisconsin's offense would march down the field on Michigan. An interception probably heeds more points for Wisconsin.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Purdue: Where Michigan looked awful


Let's be clear about one thing: Purdue is a terrible football team. Despite my assertion that their hodgepodge quaterbacking troupe would outperform their season averages against one of the worst defenses in college football, they looked lost, hopeless, and overmatched in almost every regard. Were it not for a 39-yard screen pass that resulted from a missed Michigan tackle, Purdue's quarterbacks were 16/32 for 93 yards (2.9 YPA!!!). Their running game was just was bad averaging 3.4 YPC. Purdue is bad; possibly the worst team in the Big Ten.

With that said, Michigan's 27-16 victory was... uninspiring. Purdue's defensive line thoroughly destroyed what has been one of the best offensive lines in the country this year. Part of that was due to Manimal Ryan Kerrigan, who made any Michigan lineman who tried to guard him look like a high schooler. His stat line was ridiculous: 4 sacks, 2 forced fumbles, and 10 tackles. Kerrigan is a legit top-10 NFL pick this year, but his end-to-end destruction of the offensive line is disturbing, both on a coaching standpoint (no H-back to chip block him?) and performance outlook. On Michigan's last drive, they went exclusively to their heavy set with both tight ends in the game and only two receivers, which had mixed, but generally positive results.

It stands to reason that both Michigan and Illinois were worn out from last week's marathon. Both teams faced wildly overmatched opponents (Purdue and Minnesota), and both struggled significantly. At least Michigan came out on top. The other mitigating factor was Michigan's inability to get anything going during the game due to turnovers, some of which could be attributed to the foul weather. Denard was constantly sailing deep passes--worse than he has all year, likely because of the rain--and holding onto the ball was a problem for both teams. It was an ugly win, but it was still a win. Michigan should regroup this week and get ready for the two-week gauntlet against Wisconsin and Ohio State.

Bullets
  • Though Denard looked bad all game, he didn't get much help from the offensive line that was getting constantly beaten at the line of scrimmage. Vincent Smith had a good day because Purdue was over compensating for Denard, and when Denard did pull the ball, the offensive line looked sluggish. His passing wasn't great either. Anything that he threw downfield sailed well over receivers' heads and his short passes were often inaccurate. This was probably Denard's worst game of the year, at least some of which would be attributed to the rain.
  • Forcier looked just as bad as Denard did when he came into the game. Again, I think this falls on the weather and offensive line.
  • Michigan's defense looked functional. They played in almost exclusively three-man fronts, and showed a lot of 3-3-5 with the occasional 3-4 look. It was encouraging that the defense performed the way it did without Mike Martin and Jonas Mouton, caveats about level of competition noted.
  • I'll have to watch more closely on the tape, but I think Courtney Avery had a really good game aside from the 39-yard screen pass on which he was the primary culprit. Ray Vinopal also seemed to have another good day. And Mark Moundros appeared to play really well at both outside and inside lineback positions.
  • I don't really have much else to say other than let's be thankful Michigan came out on top. I'm sure there will be plenty of stuff to break down this week to try and make sense of Michigan's awful day.

Monday, November 8, 2010

Illinois: Where Michigan's bowling


"It's been a good week. Mr. Brandon and I both talked about that on the way over here. It's been a good week." - Rich Rodriguez

It's hard to sum up Michigan's win against Illinois any more succinctly. Maybe if I could find a picture of the smile Rodriguez gave when he said "It's been a good week."

This game played out like basically all of Michigan's this year: crazy offense, lots of defensive lapses, Denard injury, down-to-the-wire shootout, turnovers, etc. Except Michigan actually won this game. Illinois' offense was just a little too sputtering to overcome Michigan's, which was able to dispense Illinois' defense--that had won them five games already this year--with ease. Now, Rich Rodriguez can look ahead to Purdue and, with any luck, 2011, a year that should see Michigan contend for a Big Ten title.

It's worth mentioning that there's a non-zero chance that Greg Robinson is retained at the end of the year. In my Where Are They Now posts during the bye week, I said this,
However, there's 0% chance [Greg Robinson]'s fired at the end of the year granted that Rodriguez is kept on board. Rich Rod realizes the talent issues Robinson is facing and will afford him at least one more year.
So maybe 0% was probably a little overzealous. But given what appeared to be improvements from the defense in this game (about more which in a minute) and the fact that Robinson has gained Rich Rod's trust the past two years--running the 3-3-5 at his behest, et al--there's a distinct possibility that he sticks around for another year. I wouldn't be all that against it, given Michigan continues to improve like they did on Saturday.

Bullets
  • 65 points be damned; Michigan's defense looked better in this Illinois game. And all it took was doing away with the 3-3-5. Of Illinois' 16 possessions, six of them ended in punts, one in a turnover, one in a missed field goal, and the rest in touchdowns or field goals (forcing field goals, go figure). I'll take a 50% success rate with this Michigan defense. "Slightly below average" is way better than "worst in the country" if you ask me, especially when Mike Martin isn't playing for much of the game. Now if we could just do something about those...
  • Turnovers. Denard's first interception should be credited to Roy Roundtree who, on the previous play, dropped a first down pass that hit him square in the gut with no defenders around him. Denard's second was both his and Martell Webb's fault. I think Webb was probably a hot read who didn't get his head turned around in time. Forcier's fumble was... bad. The others were not great.
  • Michigan's kick coverage was awful in this game. Kickoffs--and there were a lot of them--were routinely returned to the 40-yard line or beyond. I don't know if this was something that Illinois was doing or something that Michigan was doing, but it was ugly.
  • Nathan Scheelhaase is definitively the worst starting quarterback in the Big Ten. Dude simply can't throw. His stats probably speak for themselves, but to reiterate what I said in my preview: daring him to throw downfield, even with Michigan's defense, is probably a good idea.
  • Argh halfback wheel routes. Halfback wheel routes are Michigan's new MOEAKI!!!
  • Courtney Avery was functional-to-good. Maybe it was because of Michigan's overall scheme change, but dude looked like an upgrade from Floyd. He made a huge first-down-saving tackle in the open field and generally played well. Ray Vinopal also had a few big plays in the game and looks like he might be a functional answer to Michigan's free safety problem.
  • Michigan's successful two-point conversion was the same play that Forcier threw to Matthews to beat Notre Dame last year. Michigan gets man coverage on the outside and runs a slant-out play that gets the receiver open in the corner. Forcier made a better pass to Hemingway than he did to Matthews, but both ended the same way.
  • Roy Roundtree getting pulled down from behind was... ominous.
If Denard has a concussion (and he likely does), Michigan should be able to start Forcier against Purdue and still come out with a victory. I'd rather see Denard get healthy for the Wisconsin/Ohio State gauntlet than risk more serious injury against a team that Michigan should be able to dispense of. But for now, I'll just enjoy this victory.